|
Post by shibolet on Jan 4, 2005 7:23:01 GMT -5
This is the fourth and last group of names out of 27 names in total.
Please cast your votes on EACH group! Voting possible until the 9th of januari.
|
|
|
Post by gkmac123 on Jan 4, 2005 12:20:39 GMT -5
Chaim,
It probably won't matter, because it won't get many votes, but the words Unrecognizium and Unrecognisium were meant to be the same word... just two different spellings for it. (I didn't care which spelling was used.) So, a vote for one is a vote for the other and the votes for either of these two words should be totalled together.
Cheers, Greg
WILL COUNT THESE TWO TOGETHER! CHAIM
|
|
|
Post by evm111 on Jan 7, 2005 21:24:23 GMT -5
Hello, by the way, I didn't mean to lump all of these together: USeNSe, twosense, trusense, quadsense / plusense.
They really sound discordant together (plusense and trusense were just 2 examples that came from USeNSe; there were others, like blusense, crusense, but none of them sounded very good). Twosense and Quadsense I think were Oded's contributions... It looks like the one I really favored (nÛSeNSe/nÛSeNSes) is losing out vote-wise, shucks! So can USeNSe, twosense, trusense, quadsense / plusense be reduced to just USeNSe/USeNSes? Not that it will win, or anything,,,,
|
|
|
Post by gkmac123 on Jan 7, 2005 21:34:27 GMT -5
To use only USeNSe/USeNSes in the final round (it looks like the winner of Group 4) is fine with me Erik. Is this okay with you Chaim? You are the poll organizer.
Greg
|
|